Lions Whiff Again; Fail To Obtain Kentucky DE
Jeremy Jarmon (AP/Ed Reinke)
Jeremy Jarmon (AP/Ed Reinke)
Posted Jul 16, 2009

The Detroit Lions tried and failed to upgrade the defensive line on Thursday. It wasn't the first time the team has attempted to improve the defensive line in recent weeks, only to come up empty handed.

Close only counts in horseshoes and nuclear war.

Fresh off of the John Thornton close-but-not-quite debacle, and in the same offseason where the Lions very nearly signed OG Darnell Dockett, and almost pulled off a trade for QB Jay Cutler, the franchise again fell just shy of acquiring a player who could make an impact.

Thanks to getting suspended for the season due to testing positive for a banned substance, Kentucky DE Jeremy Jarmon was available in today’s supplemental draft.

The Lions’ 0-16 record in 2008 made their supplemental draft picks very powerful. The Lions could bid a pick to acquire a player, and because of their status, it would trump any other team -- unless, of course, that other team bids a higher round selection.

Since bidding a given pick in the supplemental draft means you lose that pick in the next scheduled draft, that was a huge advantage for the Lions over all the other competition.

Rumor prior to today's draft was that Jarmon could be had for a fourth-rounder, and the Lions would need only to bid their fourth.

With a large question lingering across the entire defensive line, Jarmon's presence was enticing.

Surprisingly, however, the Washington Redskins shocked everyone after choosing to bid their third-round pick, thus acquiring the rights to Jarmon.

John Niyo of the Detroit News then reported via Twitter that Lions' GM Martin Mayhew text messaged Redskins' VP Vinny Cerrato that he did, indeed, bid the Lions’ fourth-rounder for Jarmon -- and was surprised (and, naturally, disappointed) not to get him.

Should Mayhew have bid a third-rounder, thus practically guaranteeing Jarmon’s acquisition?

Assuming that Detroit's third-round pick in 2010 will hold significant value, and could become a potential starter at any position (or trade ammo), spending it now on a player with character issues wouldn’t maximize that pick's value.

While it’s certainly disappointing to lose out (again) on a potential impact rookie at a position of need, the Lions made the right move.

Related Stories
The Lions Cornerback Position? Yikes.
 -by  Jul 15, 2009
Don't Overlook Marquand Manuel
 -by  Jul 17, 2009
Lions Notebook: Pre-Camp Roster Breakdown
 -by  Jul 17, 2009

> Members-only Forums
> Insider Information
> Free Agency &
   Draft News
> Expert Chats

Sign Up Today!

Free Email Newsletter
Don't miss any news or features from Subscribe to our newsletter to have our newest articles emailed to you on a daily or weekly basis.
Click here for a list of all Team Newsletters.

Add Topics to My HotList
Get free email alerts with news about your favorite topics. Click link to add to My HotList.
Football > Detroit
[View My HotList]